📊 Recap
The Flyers kept it tight as expected, falling just short of a win but covering the +1.5 in a 4-3 final. Our model flagged a Columbus blowout as the least likely outcome, and that held — a clean result backed by solid math.
📊 Recap
Werenski finished with 2 points, clearing the 1.5 threshold and costing us this one. Our model had him projected well under that mark, and the logic was sound — sometimes the variance falls the other way.
📊 Recap
Foerster found the scoresheet tonight, and the under didn't hold. The underlying rate still supported the projection — 0.3 points per game means nights like this will happen — but the result was a loss.
📊 Recap
Drysdale recorded a point tonight, and the under didn't hold. At 67% projected probability, this was always a live outcome — the process was sound, but variance had other plans.
📊 Recap
Garland stayed true to form, finishing pointless and handing us the win. The 69% probability held up exactly as projected — a clean process play that rewarded patience and data over narrative.
📊 Recap
Bruins +1.5 cashed in a tight 2-1 Carolina win, exactly the kind of low-event defensive battle our model anticipated. Boston's ability to suppress scoring kept them within the number, and the 61% probability read held up cleanly.
📊 Recap
Pastrnak delivered exactly what the model projected, recording a point in Boston's visit to Carolina. His high-floor role on the power play and elite production rate made this a process-driven play — and tonight, the numbers held up.
📊 Recap
The Jets got blown out 5-1, and the +1.5 line never came into play. The process was sound — home team we favored, goaltending edge, back-to-back fatigue — but Florida executed and the result wasn't close. Take the L, move on.
📊 Recap
The situational edge held up — Forsberg and a fatigued Kings squad on a back-to-back couldn't pull away, and Chicago's home rest proved to be the difference in a tight 2-1 final. Blackhawks +1.5 covers cleanly.
📊 Recap
The Canadiens shut out the Blues 2-0, covering +1.5 with room to spare. Fowler's strong goaltending held up exactly as modeled, and Montreal's ability to stay competitive without Suzuki validated our near-even matchup read.
📊 Recap
Dallas dropped this one decisively, 5-1, and there's no dressing it up. The goaltending edge and home-ice advantage we identified didn't materialize — the Devils controlled the game wire to wire. A reasonable process, a bad result.
📊 Recap
The Islanders dropped a 4-3 decision but covered the +1.5, validating our read on game structure. Tight, competitive hockey kept the margin close exactly as projected, and the cushion did its job.
📊 Recap
The goaltending edge held up exactly as modeled — Wallstedt was the difference-maker, and Minnesota's 3-1 win covered the 1.5 comfortably. When net-level performance gaps are this pronounced, they tend to show up in the final score.
📊 Recap
Kaprizov finished with 2 points, clearing the 1.5 threshold and handing us the loss. The baseline probability still supported the under, but tonight he landed in the minority outcome — variance is part of the game.
📊 Recap
Weegar stayed true to form, finishing the night without registering a point and validating our model's 66% probability projection. When frequency data aligns with a player's established usage pattern, the math tends to hold — and tonight it did.
📊 Recap
Vegas controlled this one wire-to-wire, winning 4-1 and making the +1.5 cushion irrelevant. Ottawa never found the competitive foothold our model anticipated — a clean loss, no excuses.
📊 Recap
The Over 6.5 didn't come close, with Ottawa and Vegas combining for just five goals in a 4-1 Knights win. Goaltending outperformed our projections on both ends — that's hockey variance, and the model's edge read was sound even if the result wasn't.
📊 Recap
Mark Stone delivered, finishing with a point as projected. The soft matchup against Ersson materialized into Golden Knights offensive opportunity, and Stone — our primary beneficiary — came through right in line with our 65% probability model.
📊 Recap
Anaheim pushed it to a 6-5 game, suggesting the structural edge we identified was real — this just didn't fall our way on the night. The process holds; variance took the result.
📊 Recap
The 11 combined goals confirmed both teams' inability to suppress scoring, exactly as the model projected. Lankinen's vulnerability and Anaheim's leaky defense delivered, with Vancouver's .812 SV% holding true to form in a high-event game that cleared 6.5 with ease.
📊 Recap
The Sharks were shut out 2-0, and Buffalo's defense showed up when it mattered most — the exact opposite of what our model anticipated. A clean loss; the offensive trends we leaned on simply didn't materialize tonight.
📊 Recap
Buffalo and San Jose combined for just two goals in a 2-0 Sharks shutout, the worst-case outcome for an Over ticket. The model read the goaltending vulnerabilities correctly on paper, but both teams played suffocating defensive hockey — variance wins this one.
Want the full card?
Premium members get all picks, risk profiles, and position sizing.
View Premium Picks →