📊 Recap
Burns and the Reds couldn't hold the edge in a 6-5 loss to Cleveland. The process was sound — the pitching metrics supported the play — but the outcome didn't follow, and that's part of the game.
📊 Recap
Detroit delivered in a big way, 14-0, validating our projection of Kremer's underlying vulnerability and the starter quality gap. The Tigers' offense showed up exactly as the metrics suggested, turning a strong process call into a dominant result.
📊 Recap
Nola struggled as projected, and Alcantara's edge in a clean dome environment held up — Miami secured the 1-0 win. The model's read on Nola's inflated ERA translating into real trouble proved correct, even if the margin was tighter than the run projections implied.
📊 Recap
Cleveland dropped a 2-0 decision to Cincinnati, and the bat went quiet on both sides. The pitching edge we identified didn't translate to run support, and a low-scoring game ultimately went the wrong way — a clean loss with no excuses.
📊 Recap
Minnesota took care of business, 3-2, with Brady Singer delivering again against a Kansas City lineup our model had pegged at a structural disadvantage. The pitching edge we identified held, and the Twins' projected run environment was enough to close it out.
📊 Recap
Yankees won 3-2, validating the structural edge we identified. Cole's dominance against this White Sox roster and the bullpen quality gap held firm — exactly the win-probability advantage we projected.
📊 Recap
Houston took care of business in a tight 3-2 win, validating the edge we identified. Lambert's strong underlying metrics held, the Angels' bullpen couldn't contain the damage, and Alvarez's lineup delivered just enough — exactly the process-driven outcome the model projected.
📊 Recap
The Padres fell short in a high-scoring 8-7 game, a result that defied the projected run environment and King's profile against this lineup. The edge was real, but baseball variance is undefeated — process holds regardless of outcome.
📊 Recap
Boston dropped a tight one to Oakland 4-3. The bullpen edge we leaned on didn't materialize enough to overcome a one-run deficit — a frustrating result, but a 1-run loss in a low-confidence spot is well within expected variance. Process holds.
📊 Recap
The Under 7.5 didn't hold, with the game finishing 8-2. Both starters and the run-suppressive environment we leaned on failed to deliver — a clean loss against our projection, no mitigating factors to point to.
📊 Recap
The Under hit the number — a 7-6 final came in well below our 8.55 projection — but the Dodgers' side of the total ran hotter than modeled, and the combined 13 runs just cleared 9.5. A sharp process, a tough beat.
Want the full card?
Premium members get all picks, risk profiles, and position sizing.
View Premium Picks →